Launched in 2009 and arriving in stores June 19, the iPhone 3GS was Apple’s performance-focused follow-up to the iPhone 3G. Apple marketed it as “up to twice as fast” as the 3G; teardown reports and third-party testing confirmed a jump in core hardware (a ~600 MHz ARM Cortex‑A8 CPU, a faster PowerVR SGX GPU and 256 MB of RAM, up from 412 MHz and 128 MB). Apple also added camera/video recording, multimedia messaging and voice dialing as consumer-facing features.
This review synthesizes teardown data, benchmark reporting and real-world tests from the period: EveryMac’s teardown summary, Gizmodo’s OpenGL/graphics benchmarks, CNET’s feature and connectivity reporting, and user-speed tests such as the Osomac app-launch comparisons. I also checked aggregated benchmark listings (PhonesData, GadgetVersus) and the contemporaneous hands-on notes cited in those sources to form conclusions grounded in measured results and documented user complaints.
High-level verdict: the 3GS meaningfully raised CPU, memory and GPU capacity over the 3G—benchmarks showed CPU gains in the 40–70% range and GPU fillrate and texture performance multiples—making it the clear upgrade for performance and gaming. Downsides: Apple left core OS limitations in place (no multitasking, no Flash/USB mass-storage), and independent reviews called out no improvement to call quality and uneven 3G reception, so it’s a mixed bag if connectivity and modern OS features are priorities.
How much faster is the 3GS in real use?
Hardware teardowns documented the 3GS CPU as an ARM Cortex‑A8 running at about 600 MHz, versus roughly 412 MHz in the iPhone 3G, and doubled system RAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). Apple’s claim of “up to twice as fast” is supported by those raw hardware deltas, and independent app‑launch and boot tests (for example the Osomac comparisons) showed consistently faster cold boots and application start times on the 3GS.
Benchmarks summarized by EveryMac and others reported CPU-level gains in the rough range of 40–70% depending on the test and workload. In short, the 3GS is a clear step up for snappier UI, faster app launches and better multitasking headroom (within the single-tasking OS constraints of the era).
Big GPU improvements — what that actually means for games
Gizmodo’s OpenGL benchmarking showed the 3GS’s graphics pipeline far outpacing the 3G: fillrate measured about 3–4× higher, and texture effects/filters roughly 10× faster in the tested workloads. That translated to significantly higher frame rates and more complex visual effects in contemporaneous games and demos.
The 3GS also supports newer OpenGL features (OpenGL 2.x capability noted in coverage), meaning developers could target richer shaders and effects on the 3GS that the 3G could not run or would run poorly. The practical result: a substantially better gaming experience on the 3GS and a longer useful life for graphically ambitious apps of that generation.
What the 3GS added — and what stayed the same
CNET’s review and the product brief note practical feature additions: multimedia messaging (MMS), video recording and voice dialing arrived with the 3GS. These were tangible, everyday feature increases compared with the 3G model.
However, Apple’s OS-level restrictions remained in place at launch: the 3GS did not introduce true multitasking, nor support Flash Lite or native USB mass‑storage/USB file transfer. Those platform limits constrained some use cases despite the faster hardware underneath.
Battery promises and real-world cellular behavior
Apple marketed the 3GS with promised improvements to battery life (noted in CNET’s coverage as a promised increase). The cited sources emphasize the promise rather than a single standardized measurement in that coverage; independent usage reports at the time varied with workload and network conditions.
On connectivity, reviewers repeatedly flagged that call quality showed no improvement from the 3G and that 3G reception could be uneven. That remained one of the 3GS’s most common user complaints despite the hardware performance boost.
Physical design and everyday use
The 3GS retained the same external design language as the 3G, so pocket feel, weight and basic ergonomics were essentially unchanged while internal responsiveness improved thanks to the faster CPU and doubled RAM.
Usability gains came primarily from speed: faster app launches, smoother scrolling and improved in‑app performance. But system-level interface behaviors that required multitasking or background processing were still constrained by the OS design of the time.
Pros & Cons
- ✅ Hardware uplift: ~600 MHz ARM Cortex‑A8 CPU versus ~412 MHz in the 3G (Apple claimed “up to twice as fast”).
- ✅ Double the RAM: 256 MB versus 128 MB on the 3G, improving app headroom and multitasking responsiveness within iOS limits.
- ✅ Large GPU gains: benchmarks reported fillrate 3–4× higher and texture/effect performance about 10× faster (Gizmodo).
- ✅ Added consumer features: multimedia messaging (MMS), video recording and voice dialing documented in CNET coverage.
- ✅ Measurable real-world speed: independent app-launch and boot tests showed noticeably faster startup and app performance (Osomac reports).
- ❌ No call quality improvement: reviewers reported no change in call audio quality versus the 3G (CNET).
- ❌ Uneven 3G reception: reviewers noted spotty 3G reception behavior in real-world tests (CNET).
- ❌ Platform limits remain: no multitasking, no Flash Lite support and no native USB mass‑storage/USB file transfer (CNET).
- ❌ Future-proofing caveat: while the 3GS supports OpenGL 2.x, increasing graphics requirements meant older 3G devices would be left behind as developers targeted newer features (Gizmodo).
How It Compares to the Competition
- Apple iPhone 3G — The immediate predecessor with a ~412 MHz CPU and 128 MB RAM; clearly slower in CPU and GPU workloads compared with the 3GS.
- Apple iPod touch (2nd generation) — Provides the iOS app ecosystem without cellular voice/data; lacks iPhone features such as calls and MMS that the 3GS adds.
- Apple iPod touch (3rd generation) — A contemporaneous iPod touch that focused on improved media and graphics but still did not offer cellular connectivity that the 3GS provides.
Who Should Buy This & Who Should Skip It
Buy it if: Buy the iPhone 3GS if you’re upgrading from an iPhone 3G or an earlier iPhone and want noticeably faster CPU/GPU performance, doubled RAM and added features like video recording and MMS. It's the right choice for users prioritizing app responsiveness and better gaming/graphics capability from that generation.
Skip it if: Skip the 3GS if your priorities are improved call audio or consistently better cellular reception—reviews recorded no improvement there. Also skip if you need OS-level features absent at launch (true multitasking, Flash support or USB mass storage); those platform limitations were unchanged.
Search Purchase Options
Use these links to search for Apple iPhone 3GS on trusted marketplaces. The links open in new tabs; if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
* Affiliate links: you pay the same price either way.